Methodical Improvement in PRS Shooting – Applying Continuous Improvement Thinking to the Firing Line
Most experienced PRS shooters eventually reach the same uncomfortable realization: just shooting more doesn’t automatically make you better.
You can burn barrels, spend weekends at the range, and travel to matches year after year—yet your results stay stubbornly flat. Maybe you clean some stages and completely fall apart on others. Maybe your fundamentals are solid, but under time pressure something leaks. Or maybe you simply feel that you should be better than your scores suggest.
In business, that kind of plateau would trigger a process review. In PRS, we often just shrug and buy more ammo.
This series is built around a different idea: treating shooting improvement the same way high-performing organizations treat performance improvement. Corporate continuous improvement models—whether Lean, PDCA, or Kaizen—are all built on the same loop: identify weaknesses, apply focused effort, measure results, adapt, and repeat. That same loop maps extremely well onto precision rifle shooting.
Over seven chapters, we’ll walk through a closed-circle methodology designed to help seasoned shooters improve deliberately, not accidentally. This isn’t beginner-level fundamentals, and it’s not about chasing the latest gear trend. It’s about building a repeatable process that lets you diagnose problems, fix them efficiently, and avoid stagnation.
This first post lays the foundation. We’ll cover the first three steps of the circle:
- Identifying weaknesses honestly
- Practicing with intent and precision
- Measuring progress in ways that actually matter
Everything that follows in later posts builds on these three pillars.

Chapter 1: Identifying Weaknesses — The Hardest Step
Continuous improvement always starts with self-awareness. And this is where most shooters quietly fail.
Self-Awareness and Brutal Honesty
If you’re shooting PRS long enough, you already know your strengths. The problem is that improvement lives in the places we’d rather not look.
Being honest about weaknesses is uncomfortable because it challenges identity. It’s much easier to say “I just had a bad stage” than to admit that you consistently struggle with positional recoil management or rushed wind calls. But without honesty, there is no meaningful progress—only motion.
Weaknesses can show up in many forms:
- A specific position (tripod, tank trap, low kneeling)
- A recurring miss pattern (low-left under pressure, vertical stringing)
- Mental breakdowns and losing track of the sequence late in a stage
- Time management errors rather than shooting errors
The goal here is not self-criticism. It’s clarity.
Why Targeted Improvement Beats More Practice
Once weaknesses are clearly identified, practice stops being generic and starts being efficient. Instead of “I need to practice more barricades,” the focus becomes “I lose stability transitioning from support-side kneeling to standing.”
That level of specificity matters. Time and ammo are finite resources, and targeted practice gives you far more return than broad repetition. Every drill should exist for a reason—and that reason should map directly to a known deficiency.
Confidence Comes From Addressing Reality
One side effect of honest weakness identification is confidence. When you know what you’re working on—and why—you stop guessing. Improvement becomes predictable rather than accidental. Confidence doesn’t come from pretending weaknesses don’t exist; it comes from watching them shrink.
Setting Measurable Goals
Identifying a weakness without setting a goal is just observation. Goals turn insight into action.
Effective goals share a few traits:
- Specific
“Improve barricade shooting” is vague.
“Increase transition time when moving from a high position to a low” is actionable. - Measurable
If you can’t track it, you can’t improve it. Metrics might include hit percentage, time to first shot, transition split times or stage completion time. - Realistic
Ambition is good. Fantasy goals are not. Incremental gains compound faster than moonshots. - Time-bound
Deadlines create urgency and prevent endless “someday” improvement plans.
Most importantly, goals should evolve. As one weakness improves, another will surface. That’s not failure—that’s the system working. If you find a problem, you find an area you can systematically improve.

Chapter 2: The Art of Practice — Technique Over Volume
In PRS, practice is often mistaken for repetition. In reality, repetition without intention just reinforces habits—good or bad.
Technique Is the Foundation
At its core, precision rifle shooting is brutally honest. Fundamentals don’t disappear under match pressure; they get exposed.
Key technical elements deserve constant attention:
- Stance and balance, especially in improvised positions
- Rifle support and grip, allowing recoil to track consistently
- Breathing discipline, preventing unnecessary movement
- Trigger control, applied smoothly even when rushed
These aren’t beginner concepts. They’re perishable skills that degrade without focused maintenance.
Making Every Shot Count
Effective practice values shot quality over round count. Ten deliberate rounds with feedback are worth more than fifty mindless ones.
A few guiding principles:
- Deliberate execution: Every shot should have intent, not autopilot.
- Defined objectives: Each session should answer a question or test an assumption.
- Match realism: Practice under time, from awkward positions, with imperfect support.
- Mental presence: Distraction is the enemy of improvement.
Practice isn’t just physical. The mental habits you build on the range are the same ones you’ll carry into competition.
Mastery Is Built Slowly
Technique improves in layers. You don’t “fix” fundamentals once—you refine them continuously. The shooters who progress longest are the ones who never stop treating basics as worthy of attention.

Chapter 3: Measuring Progress — Turning Feelings Into Data
Improvement that isn’t measured is just optimism.
PRS shooters are often good at feeling whether something worked, but feelings are unreliable. Data turns assumptions into decisions.
Timing Matters
Shot timers reveal truths we’d rather ignore. They expose hesitation, inefficiency, and rushed execution. Tracking time to first shot, split times, and total stage time provides insight into whether improvements are real or imagined.
Speed without accuracy is useless—but accuracy without efficiency won’t win matches either.
Scoring and Pattern Recognition
Scores tell part of the story, but patterns tell the rest. Repeated misses in similar directions, distances, or positions point directly to solvable problems. Paper targets remain invaluable because they don’t lie.
Accuracy and precision must be evaluated separately:
- Accuracy: Are shots landing where intended?
- Precision: Are they consistently grouping?
Both matter—and each points to different fixes.
Leveraging Technology
Modern tools make tracking easier than ever. Shot timers, ballistic apps, and video review provide objective feedback that memory cannot. Used correctly, they shorten the feedback loop between action and correction.
Benchmarks and Reflection
Collected data only matters if it’s reviewed. Benchmarks create context, and reflection creates learning. Reviewing performance—alone or with trusted peers—helps separate noise from signal.
Progress isn’t always linear. Plateaus happen. Measurement ensures you notice them early and respond intelligently.
Closing the First Loop
These first three steps—honest assessment, intentional practice, and meaningful measurement—form the foundation of the improvement cycle. Skip any one of them, and the loop collapses.
In the next post, we’ll move into what happens after the data is collected: how to respond when progress stalls, how to adapt intelligently, and how to turn mistakes into leverage rather than frustration.
Improvement isn’t magic. It’s methodical. And like any good system, it only works if you actually follow it.
Upptäck mer från
Prenumerera för att få de senaste inläggen skickade till din e-post.
